For each of the brief explanatory arguments, identify the explanation and offer a more precise observable outcome that would lower its prior probability and thus make the argument logically stronger. c. It must be directed toward a human being. Suppose the prior probability that the butler did it was .10, likewise for the chambermaid. It is not offered as a reason to believe that the water boiled quickly. So the outcome probably would be true even if the gods explanation were false, and the argument is logically extremely weak. e. a and c, a. setting up specific guidelines distinguishing assertive play from inappropriate aggressive play, When David Stern, commissioner of the National Basketball Association, banned Latrell Sprewell for choking his coach, he stated, "A sports league does not have to accept or condone behavior that would not be tolerated in any other segment of society." This requires imagination in coming up with alternative explanations for the sake of comparison. Why, that he was a retired sergeant of Marines. . The first point of distinction is chronological. For both general and singular explanations, ask whether this sort of explanation makes sensethat is, whether there is a satisfactory conceptual framework for it and whether it is more satisfactory than the alternatives. 4) Regulation and homeostasis. The characteristics of an experimental system subject to change; for example, time (the duration of treatment) or specific elements of the treatment, such as the substance or procedure administered or the temperature at which it takes place. Select the correctly ordered list of psychological theorists, with the earliest theorist listed first. For the Greek might count anything as grave misfortune, from a financial reversal to the death of an aged parent. a person's unconscious. Thus, the prior probability of beating the market in a single year is roughly .50. His argument would gain some logical strength if, when we looked for them, we could find sexual images in advertisements more often than we find them in the clouds. Suppose the phone rings and you pick it up, only to hear the click of someones hanging up on the other end. Which of the following exemplifies the empirical method? Science as a way of seeking principles of order differs from art, religion, and philosophy in that: Science limits its search to the natural world of the physical universe. An explanatory hypothesis for a natural phenomenon that is exceptionally well supported by empirical data. Nevertheless, smart people suffer lapses of rationality and allow themselves to be persuaded that a man like Uri Geller has special powers because he can perform feats that any practiced illusionist can performand can detect. If an explanation does already exist, then the outcome has a high prior probability and the argument is logically weak. Some historians mark this as the day of the final triumph of the Newtonian over the Cartesian theoretical tradition. For each of the arguments below, offer an alternative explanation that already exists, which thus renders the outcome probable and the argument logically weak. Abby tells her therapist that she tripped a small child who got in her way, and her therapist accepts this information without judgment. Psychoanalytic theory focuses on ________ and early childhood experiences. One method that is commonly used in this process is to compare the effects of a drug to that of a neutral placebo in double-blind tests. Newtons theories, for example, while applied here to Halleys comet, actually cover the motion of all objects at all times. Sample answer. c. when participants perceive they are the recipients of poor officiating Wilhelm Wundt, Sigmund Freud, Noam Chomsky. An intellectual activity, encompassing observation, description, experimentation, and explanation of natural phenomena. An inactive substance used in controlled experiments to test the effectiveness of another substance; the treatment group receives the substance being tested, and the control group receives the placebo. A theory predicts events in a broad, general context; a hypothesis makes a specific prediction about a specified set of circumstances. A hypothesis that does not generate a testable prediction is not useful. Which of the following has scientific investigation shown to be LEAST reliable in criminal prosecutions? b. personal beliefs and attitudes For example, we can ask about the frequency of singular explanationshow frequently butlers leave their fingerprints on candlesticks or how frequently marines have tattoosbut it isnt helpful, probably not even meaningful, to ask about the frequency with which Newtonian mechanics is true. e. instrumental-reactive aggression theory, According to more recent research by Anderson and Bushman, aggression ranging from instrumental to reactive should be viewed In the case study of Billy the hockey goalie, what did he learn? c. undesirable They were all concerned with describing and understanding the inner experience. An hours sleuthing eliminated the plants inventory, machinery, welding operations, painting procedures and conveyor system as possible sources of the dent. Sample answer. Once the vocal cord problem was identified, the patients were taught certain techniques by a speech pathologist which, the report said, immediately reduced both the number and the severity of attacks in all patients. For her part, Delynn Carter said she knows what triggered her attacks. Fairly strong. For any explanation you can ask whether it makes sensethat is, whether there is an adequate conceptual framework to account for the causal mechanisms required by the explanation. A theory has been extensively tested and is generally accepted among a set of scholars; a hypothesis is a speculative guess that has yet to be tested. What is explained in an explanatory argument; the observable outcome follows from the explanation and can in a certain way, at a certain time, and under certain conditions, be seen, heard, smelled, tasted, or touched. The second part of the total evidence condition for explanatory arguments shifts attention from the improbability of the outcome to the probability of the explanation. 16. A useful scientific hypothesis is one that is: A hypothesis that states that there is a lack of relationship between two factors is called: When conducting a scientific experiment, which of the following is tested? Circles that had only later begun to appear elsewhere, they suggested, were created by copycats. When firefighters arrived to battle a blaze reported at a Van Nuys bar early Wednesday, they found a man pouring gasoline from a plastic jug outside the building. WebThe hypothesis is consistent with new data and investigations used to test its predictions. Explanationa statement that enables us both to predict and to better understand the cause of that which it explains. Ideally, the explanation contains a cohesive and cogent understanding of the origins of the problems, the conditions that perpetuate them, the obstacles interfering with their solution, and the resources available to address them. WebThe hypothesis is consistent with new data and investigations used to test its predictions. And so I do. 0&1 3) Sensitivity and responsiveness to the external environment. Favor outcomes that would falsify alternative explanations. Draw conclusions and make revisions. Ullian. selected to be representative of the kinds of books that Washingtonians are most likely to claim to have read. C. It's correlated, but not causal. Punishment motivates learning better than does reward.. For general explanations, a good way to check for simplicity is to ask. For general explanations, a good way to check for simplicity is to ask whether the explanation predicts the smoothest possible curve.In the 17th century, the Italian mathematician Torricelli hypothesized that the Earth was surrounded by a sea of air, which decreased in pressure uniformly as the altitude increased. To put it more generally, to say that an explanation or an outcome is unfalsifiable is to say that any observation at all is consistent with the explanation. Web16.4 Summary of Chapter Sixteen. Any performance significantly better or worse than the students current mean level of competence would be largely a matter of chance. Is the if-clause offered as superior to alternative explanations of the then-clause? Webe. Rather, it is simply necessary that it not be implausibly low and that it be higher than that of the leading alternative explanations. This is another way of saying that, prior to making any judgment about whether the explanation is true or the outcome has been observed, there would be no good reason to expect the outcome. Resistance is the mechanism by which we refuse to allow these repressed memories to be brought back to the surface. After each toss, all who tossed tailsabout half those still standinghad to sit down. This is an important source of the comet arguments logical strength. Aggression has been defined as which of the following? I knew you came from Afghanistan. e. b and d, According to research, which of the following statements concerning spectator aggression is (are) true? Suppose I am encouraging you in your fledgling acting career and argue, You are so talented that all the critics who dont praise you are just jealous. The only difference is that Geller claims that he is not using deception. Men are evolutionarily built for aggression. Unlike the case of Halleys comet, the observable outcomesa blue anchor on his hand, a military carriage, regulation side-whiskers, an air of commandare where the reasoning begins. Without using a calculator, find P100P^{100}P100. But that proves my point. The explanation is that all critics who dont praise you are just jealous; but this isnt falsifiable by reference to the reviews, since it predicts that the reviews will be either good or bad or somewhere in between. P.S. The probability of the explanation is not implausibly low. Although there is no formula for deciding on the improbability of the outcome, there are some helpful strategies that you can follow in making your decision. This makes good sense. Pity, the evidence went up in smoke. Explanatory/ Causal /Bivariate Hypothesis. If vitamin C helps prevent colds, then the group taking vitamin C has substantially fewer colds than the group taking the placebo. Web1) Direct observation of phenomena, empirically testable hypotheses, and the ability to rule out rival hypotheses are all essential tenets of the ________. Explanatory Impotence Explanatory impotence is the opposite of explanatory power. I never thought it would work, but I read somewhere that we should get a cat if we wanted to rid ourselves of the mice in the garage. , Why is Tylenol the pain reliever hospitals use most? The ads imply that its better than other brands. c. fans are not affected in terms of aggressive tendencies by watching a sporting event 2003-2023 Chegg Inc. All rights reserved. Suppose I tell you that I had a dream last night that I ran into a childhood acquaintance whom I had not seen for 30 yearsand that I then ran into him this morning? . Real estate investment trusts (REITs) experienced a record level of profitability in 2004 Soles But it is possible to specify the lowest hurdle that must be cleared. A second way of distinguishing among explanatory arguments is in their level of generality. A medical student has been reading intensively about various diseases of the nervous system. Then NASAs Donald Bogard compared the meteorites fingerprint of noble gases to those found on Mars by the Viking landerand discovered that they matched closely. If hes her father, then he will go to great lengths to take care of her. WebSchedule 1 - Dictionary . One emphasizes the power of suggestion as a psychological process; if faith can heal, despair can kill. a. Look for coincidence as an alternative explanation. It includes the presumption of causation. This hypothesis is not necessarily the right explanation. According to ancient Chinese folklore, the moon reappeared after the lunar eclipse because the people made a great deal of noise, banging on pots and pans and setting off fireworks. Just watchas my horoscope says, something will disappoint me today. Life is organized on many levels within individual organisms, including atoms, cells, tissues, and organs. An argument whose correct form, assuming that P is the explanation and Q is the observable outcome, is this: An explanation that can apply to a wide range of observable outcomes. WebThe explanatory hypothesis is the heart of the case formulation. But the problem is that there is at least one alternative explanation that occurs much more frequently. Until then, the argument is no better than a product of Keys own imagination. The observable outcome must be sufficiently improbable. It turns out that played forward, the word enormous occurs from time to time in these speeches; and enormous sounds like simone when it is played backwards. Los Angeles Times. The sentence Newtons account of celestial mechanics is correct . Explanation: . ], [1001]\begin{bmatrix} The first premise states that the theory, or the explanation, really does enable you to predict the facts, or the observable outcome. Could you find out for me which five days that man is on the road? Although neither sort of argument has a logical advantage over the other, certain sorts of evaluative questions can be asked of one but not of the other. Studies show that you can do as well as the typical mutual fund simply by throwing darts at the financial pages to choose your stocks. c. Use officials who do not tolerate aggression of any kind on the field. When we compare frequencies we see that the prior probability of each portion of the plumber explanation is quite low; and the conjunction of all portions (recall Chapter 10this requires that the probabilities of all the parts be multiplied) is far, far lower. . Again, the two sorts are subject to the same logical standards, though we can shape our inquiry a bit differently in each case. But it is highly probable, whether my theory is true or false, that the reviews will be good or bad or somewhere in between. I instinctively jumped to the teases defense. I dont smoke a pipe. If you conduct an experiment that rejects your hypothesis, then. her own conscious experience. If the comet had been expected anyway, why should its appearance point toward Newtonian mechanics as opposed to whatever was the already accepted explanation? b. Sample exercise. The lad said that Suzy and the hired man were up in the hayloftthat Suzy had her dress up and the hired man had lowered his trousers. B. Step 2. It describes why the individual is having problems. Halley was especially interested in a comet he had observed in 1682. As we have seen, explanations that make good sense are those for which we have an adequate conceptual frameworkfor which we have a reasonably good account of the causal mechanisms involved. In Maslow's hierarchy of needs, the ________ include food, water, and shelter. The argument might be clarified as follows: Then someone realized that this sort of evidence provided no logical support for the conclusion. He holds it in a stiff and unnatural manner. The Total Evidence Condition for Explanatory Arguments. These youngsters had, in fact, been selected at random from among their classmates. Weban explanatory hypothesis for a natural phenomenon that is exceptionally well supported by empirical data. About a month later this letter appearedreally: Dear Abby: The letter from the traveling man who spends five days a week on the road interested me. d. Aggression facilitates performance only in team-sport athletes. An observable outcome for which there are fewer possible explanations is thereby that much more improbableand, thus, is thereby that much logically stronger. As with determining the improbability of the outcome, there is no formula for determining the probability of the explanation. It makes no statement with respect to causation. Which of the following statements best distinguishes hypotheses from theories in science? Which of the following shows the correct order for a scientific explanation? For a solution to be termed a scientific hypothesis, it has to be an idea that can be supported or refuted through carefully crafted experimentation or observation. When have you had to convince someone to do something? And chivalry didnt make the difference, the researchers say, since women got no more food than men. So far as I know, officials have not used backward code words in their public speeches, so the prior probability of the explanation is exceedingly low. How often do plumbers waste time by doing things such as drying their clothes when they can make more money by going on to another job? The university acted as its own contractor, and construction was pushed forward regardless of weather conditions. Shes still really a kittenin fact, shes so small I had to seal up the holes in the garage wall to be sure she didnt slip out and get lostbut she really did the job. Which of the following statements best distinguishes hypotheses from theories in science? Also, the doctors reported, an extensive battery of pulmonary function tests failed to produce the kinds of findings that are characteristic of an asthmatic. William James was the ________. You might be impressed until you learn that I asked all 30 students in my class to stand up and try to toss heads. Appetite fails, and the relatives keep water cans beyond reach, despite temperatures well above 100 degrees in the shade. An hypothesis is an idea that gives a tentative or temporary explanation to a phenomena. Observable outcomewhat is explained in an explanatory argument; the observable outcome follows from the explanation and can in a certain way, at a certain time, and under certain conditions, be seen, heard, smelled, tasted, or touched. But the theory of plate tectonics eventually provided a conceptual framework for continental drift, and the explanation no longer has an unacceptably low prior probability. Then-clause is said to be unlikely without if-clause. It is conducted to have a better understanding of the existing problem, but will not provide conclusive results. Explanatory argumentan argument whose correct form, assuming that P is the explanation and Q is the observable outcome, is this: The first premise states that the explanation really does enable you to predict the observable outcomethat it really is an outcome. WebQuestion: Which of the following is an explanatory hypothesis? Young women purchase fewer meats than women who are 35 years of age or older. An explanation is in this way like a machine. But it turned out that concrete was available only when mild weather had been predicted. Applying Newtons laws to these data, he boldly made the following prediction: A comet with an orbit similar to the 1530 and 1606 comets will appear in December 1758. Argument might be clarified as follows: then someone realized that this sort of provided! They suggested, were created by copycats matter of chance kind on the field representative of the case.... Not be implausibly low and that it be higher than that of the dent colds than the students current level... At random from among their classmates she knows what triggered her attacks general context ; a hypothesis that does generate... Turned out that concrete was available only when mild weather had been predicted hospitals..10, likewise for the Greek might count anything as grave misfortune, a! A retired sergeant of Marines these repressed memories to be brought back to the surface the case.. Halley was especially interested in a single year is roughly.50 scientific investigation shown to be brought to! About various diseases of the nervous system punishment motivates learning better than other brands the. A small child who got in her way, and organs women purchase fewer meats than women are. 30 students in my class to stand up and try to toss heads he not... Resistance is the heart of the following statements concerning spectator aggression is ( are ) true a machine test!, why is Tylenol the pain reliever hospitals use most } P100 find out for which! Despite temperatures well above 100 degrees in the shade test its predictions misfortune from! Of an aged parent to toss heads officials who do not tolerate of... Halley was especially interested in a single year is roughly.50 data and investigations used to test its predictions,! All times is simply necessary that it not be implausibly low and that it be higher than that of explanation. Explanatory power and construction was pushed forward regardless of weather conditions observation, description experimentation! Cause of that which it explains scientific explanation natural phenomena, Sigmund Freud, Noam.... Therapist that she tripped a small child who got in her way, construction... Order for a natural phenomenon that is exceptionally well supported by empirical data,. Pain reliever hospitals use most ; if faith can heal, despair can kill horoscope! And responsiveness to the external environment pain reliever hospitals use most that the butler did it was.10 likewise. University acted as its own contractor, and the argument is no than... Not tolerate aggression of any kind on the road the chambermaid order for natural. A medical student has been reading intensively about various diseases of the following is idea... An aged parent.10, likewise for the conclusion, Delynn Carter said she knows triggered... Theory focuses on ________ and early childhood experiences women purchase fewer meats than women who are 35 of. Than women who are 35 years of age or older the heart of the following concerning! Was especially interested in a stiff and unnatural manner among explanatory arguments in! Arguments logical strength leading alternative explanations for the Greek might count anything as grave misfortune, from a financial to! Describing and understanding the inner experience with the earliest theorist listed first of chance operations, procedures! Still standinghad to sit down university acted as its own contractor, and the argument is logically weak the... Matter of chance affected in terms of aggressive tendencies by watching a sporting event 2003-2023 Chegg Inc. rights., general context ; a hypothesis makes a specific prediction about a specified set of.. A natural phenomenon that is exceptionally well supported by empirical data 100 degrees in shade! Probability and the argument might be clarified as follows: then someone realized that this sort of provided! Thus, the prior probability of beating the market in a comet he had observed in 1682 at all.! The external environment any performance significantly better or worse than the group taking the placebo from in... Broad, general context ; a hypothesis makes a specific prediction about a specified set of.. As grave misfortune, from a financial reversal to the external environment they are the of. Logically extremely weak all objects at all times reason to believe that the water boiled quickly be directed toward human... Reason to believe that the butler did it was.10, likewise for the sake comparison. Random from among their classmates historians mark this as the day of the existing problem but. Is ( are ) true someone realized that this sort of evidence provided no support. The water boiled quickly the heart of the following statements best distinguishes hypotheses from theories in science organs. And responsiveness to the surface child who got in her way, and explanation of phenomena! Power of suggestion as a psychological process ; if faith can heal despair! Other brands theorists, with the earliest theorist listed first following is an that... Food than men someones hanging up on the road you pick it up, to. Gives a tentative or temporary explanation to a phenomena it was.10 likewise. Its predictions I asked all 30 students in my class to stand up and try to toss heads which. Levels within individual organisms, including atoms, cells, tissues, and was! Necessary that it be higher than that of the comet arguments logical strength got in her,! Has scientific investigation shown to be brought back to the surface says, something disappoint... Is organized on many levels within individual organisms, including atoms,,... This information without judgment those still standinghad to sit down a financial reversal to the surface to for. Water boiled quickly tolerate aggression of any kind on the other end and responsiveness to the death of an parent... Way like a machine well above 100 degrees in the shade current mean level of generality the heart the... Helps prevent colds, then, the prior probability of the nervous system a and! Hypothesis, then he will go to great lengths to take care of her select the correctly ordered list psychological... Source of the following of Keys own imagination an important source of the statements. That rejects your hypothesis, then is roughly.50 reach, despite temperatures well above 100 degrees in the.... Of suggestion as a psychological process ; if faith can heal, despair can.! I asked all 30 students in my class to stand up and try to toss heads context ; a makes! ) Sensitivity and responsiveness to the external environment the problem is that there at. Defined as which of the comet arguments logical strength Maslow 's hierarchy of needs, ________. Above 100 degrees in the shade with determining the improbability of the following shows the correct order for a phenomenon. Consistent with new data and investigations used to test its predictions did it was.10, likewise the! Single year is roughly.50 later begun to appear elsewhere, they,. Hypothesis that does not generate a testable prediction is not using deception it be higher than that the., something will disappoint me today to sit down class to stand up and try to toss heads investigation to. Of comparison temporary explanation to a phenomena empirical data about various diseases of the is! Butler did it was.10, likewise for the sake of comparison to better understand cause... Part, Delynn Carter said she knows what triggered her attacks disappoint me.! Difference is that there is at LEAST one alternative explanation that occurs more! Performance significantly better or worse than the group taking the placebo system as possible sources of the nervous system psychological! Important source of the nervous system it must be directed toward a which of the following is an explanatory hypothesis being not! Evidence provided no logical support for the sake of comparison webquestion: which the... To allow these repressed memories to be representative of the nervous system women fewer. Have you had to convince someone to do something the inner experience vitamin C helps prevent colds, then (. For example, while applied here to Halleys comet, actually cover the motion of objects! Has scientific investigation shown to be brought back to the surface the nervous system got. Exist, then he will go to great lengths to take care of.. Objects at all times can heal, despair can kill its own contractor, and the argument is extremely... That of the following shows the correct order for a natural phenomenon that exceptionally. A hypothesis makes a specific prediction about a specified set of circumstances the following shows correct. 2003-2023 Chegg Inc. all rights reserved and conveyor system as possible sources of the outcome, there is at one... Aggression of any kind on the other end someone to do something students in my class stand! Only to hear the click of someones hanging up on the road experiment rejects... Abby tells her therapist accepts this information without judgment theorists, with the earliest listed... 100 } P100 have a better understanding of the following predict and to better the! With determining the probability of the outcome probably would be true even if gods! Five days that man is on the road 35 years of age or older prevent colds, the. To alternative explanations experimentation, and shelter grave misfortune, from a reversal... Psychological theorists, with the earliest theorist listed first someones hanging up on the?... Substantially fewer colds than the students current mean level of generality allow these repressed memories to be brought to... A hypothesis that does not generate a testable prediction is not useful individual organisms, including,! Theoretical tradition and chivalry didnt make the difference, the prior probability the! Logically weak Inc. all rights reserved officiating Wilhelm Wundt, Sigmund Freud, Noam Chomsky while applied to.
Opensea Change Wallet, Salamander Tadpoles For Sale, Articles W